Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 55, 2023 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2255724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolysisis is essential for vascular blood flow maintenance and is triggered by endothelial and platelet release of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). In certain critical conditions, e.g. sepsis, acute respiratory failure (ARF) and trauma, the fibrinolytic response is reduced and may lead to widespread thrombosis and multi-organ failure. The mechanisms underpinning fibrinolysis resistance include reduced t-PA expression and/or release, reduced t-PA and/or plasmin effect due to elevated inhibitor levels, increased consumption and/or clearance. This study in critically ill patients with fibrinolysis resistance aimed to evaluate the ability of t-PA and plasminogen supplementation to restore fibrinolysis with assessment using point-of-care ClotPro viscoelastic testing (VET). METHODS: In prospective, observational studies, whole-blood ClotPro VET evaluation was carried out in 105 critically ill patients. In 32 of 58 patients identified as fibrinolysis-resistant (clot lysis time > 300 s on the TPA-test: tissue factor activated coagulation with t-PA accelerated fibrinolysis), consecutive experimental whole-blood VET was carried out with repeat TPA-tests spiked with additional t-PA and/or plasminogen and the effect on lysis time determined. In an interventional study in a patient with ARF and fibrinolysis resistance, the impact of a 24 h intravenous low-dose alteplase infusion on coagulation and fibrinolysis was prospectively monitored using standard ClotPro VET. RESULTS: Distinct response groups emerged in the ex vivo experimental VET, with increased fibrinolysis observed following supplementation with (i) t-PA only or (ii) plasminogen and t-PA. A baseline TPA-test lysis time of > 1000 s was associated with the latter group. In the interventional study, a gradual reduction (25%) in serial TPA-test lysis times was observed during the 24 h low-dose alteplase infusion. CONCLUSIONS: ClotPro viscoelastic testing, the associated TPA-test and the novel experimental assays may be utilised to (i) investigate the potential mechanisms of fibrinolysis resistance, (ii) guide corrective treatment and (iii) monitor in real-time the treatment effect. Such a precision medicine and personalised treatment approach to the management of fibrinolysis resistance has the potential to increase treatment benefit, while minimising adverse events in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: VETtiPAT-ARF, a clinical trial evaluating ClotPro-guided t-PA (alteplase) administration in fibrinolysis-resistant patients with ARF, is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05540834 ; retrospectively registered September 15th 2022).


Subject(s)
Fibrinolysis , Tissue Plasminogen Activator , Humans , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/pharmacology , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Fibrin Clot Lysis Time , Point-of-Care Systems , Prospective Studies , Feasibility Studies , Critical Illness/therapy , Plasminogen/pharmacology
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(9): 2430-2432, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-659577
3.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(9): 2118-2122, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-599236

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has provided many challenges in the field of thrombosis and hemostasis. Among these is a novel form of coagulopathy that includes exceptionally high levels of D-dimer. D-dimer is a marker of poor prognosis, but does this also imply a causal relationship? These spectacularly raised D-dimer levels may actually signify the failing attempt of the fibrinolytic system to remove fibrin and necrotic tissue from the lung parenchyma, being consumed or overwhelmed in the process. Indeed, recent studies suggest that increasing fibrinolytic activity might offer hope for patients with critical disease and severe respiratory failure. However, the fibrinolytic system can also be harnessed by coronavirus to promote infectivity and where antifibrinolytic measures would also seem appropriate. Hence, there is a clinical paradox where plasmin formation can be either deleterious or beneficial in COVID-19, but not at the same time. Hence, it all comes down to timing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , Fibrinolysis/drug effects , Acute Lung Injury , Animals , Antifibrinolytic Agents/pharmacology , Fibrin/metabolism , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Fibrinolysin/metabolism , Humans , Immune System , Lung/metabolism , Necrosis , Prognosis , Thrombolytic Therapy , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL